Approved
Recent Forum Posts
Since your character is only level 7, normally I'm supposed to charge you 5 rep, however since this is an honest mistake and you have done no reworks of late, the first one's on the house. Feats changed.
Any chance this can get finalized? The original request has been sitting there since Jan 29th.
I would like to retrain my Shield Proficiency feat, and if possible, my Martial Weapon Proficiency (Cinqueda sword) feat as well, since i just gained Proficiency from Battle Sorcerer.
If possible, i would like to gain Mobility, and Practiced Spell Caster.
i dont spend spending money and some such to retrain feats, Maybe, at a trainer?
Noted and approved
Panic, Chaos, Fear… My work here is done.
Spending 608 UP to gain 4256 exp and 4864 gp.
My exp total should be up to 28,004 exp, pushing me from 7th to 8th.
I will be giving Mythiv his first level in Battle Sorcerer (the variant sorcerer type)
His lvl 8 stat increase will go to Charisma.
672 UP spent for 12,096 xp and 94,080 gp
XP After: 166,285
UP After: 51
6 REP Spent on XP to gain 5,400 XP
XP After: 171,685 (Level 19)
REP After: 64
Minor Re-write approved
2 REP Spent on XP to gain 1,900 xp
XP After: 173,585
REP After: 62
Approved
Approved
121 UP Paid for 968 xp and 1,210 gp
964 xp paid for craftings
XP After: 28,005
UP After: 2,294
Approved
359 UP spent for 2,513 xp and 2,872 gp
XP After: 28,001 xp (and Level 8)
UP After: 2,415
Approved
Starting Gold 30744.2
Paying 25665 for http://therafimrpg.wikidot.com/forum/t-397838/cecilia#post-1370787
Ending Gold 5079.2
Summary of items gained in case link changes in the future: +4 Gauntlets of Ogre Strength, Armbands of Might, Torc of the Titans and Natural Armour +1, Cloak of Resistance +2, Healing belt upgraded to Healing Belt of Battle
Looking to buy a Scrying mirror for Cecilia, costing 1000 gp.
Restocking my Holy and Cold Ironshod Arrows. 525 + 20 Gold
Total Cost: 545 gold
Gold Left: 2778
Approving this since Kara passed the level adjustment limits long before the buyoff was in place.
However, this does not set a precedent that characters can choose to buy off a LA at any time they please beyond the LA buyoff limits.
As clarification, when a character reaches ECL 10/15 they must choose at that time if they wish to buyoff a LA. If they -dont- then they cant choose to come back later and buyoff said LA after the fact and have to wait until the next ECL limit to buyoff a LA.
Characters who are already past the limit since the rule was put into effect will be evaluated as such
Noted, and approved
As this is a new rule and I am well beyond the threshold of ECL 10. i'd like to buy down the first of two LA+.
Page states a 9k exp cost for the first LA. leaving me with 123,189xp / 136k and still ECL 16. Making me eligible to buy off the second LA+ at the cost of 14k exp.
This leaves me with 109,189/120,000xp and 15th class level with no LA+ remaining.
Should spells with free material components be listed as having material components in the spell description?
Use your best judgement, really but alot of people probably don't bother reading anything less than 100g value due to applied eschew materials.
Should spells with expensive material components under 125 gp (which are free to cast due to free eschew materials) have those expensive material components removed? Na its nice to know what they are at least
If no, should they be marked as having an expensive material component in the spell list (such as the page "Cleric Spells")? I rather agree with Lisa ^
Are all spells from the Player's Handbook, as they appear in the SRD, legal?
Yes
Do any of these spells in the Player's Handbook have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
no
Are all spells from Spell Compendium legal?
Yes
Do any of these legal spells from the Spell Compendium have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
No
Are all spells from the Player's Handbook 2 legal?
Yes
Do any of these legal spells from the Player's Handbook 2 have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
No
Are all psionic powers and magic spells from the Expanded Psionics Handbook legal?
Yes
Do any of these legal spells from Expanded Psionics Handbook have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
No
Are all psionic powers and magic spells from Complete Psionic legal?
Yes
Do any of these legal spells/powers from Complete Psionic have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
No
Are any domains changed from their original source, in name, spell list, or granted power?
Not that I know of
Should any domains not currently used by a deity be removed?
Ehh there are ways to pick out a domain with feats so leave them
Are all Artificer Infusions found in the Eberron Campaign Setting legal, and do they have any changes made to them beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
As written they are approved
Are any other Artificer Infusions from other books (ex; Magic of Eberron) legal, and do they have any changes made to the mbeyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
Case by case basis right now
Are all Binder vestiges and Shadowcaster mysteries, as they originally appeared in Tome of Magic, legal? Do any have changes made to them beyond the most recent errata?
binders are a odd class and the default here is case by case, sorry
Are any Binder vestiges or Shadowcaster mysteries from any other source legal?
At the moment not really but they can be proposed not that anyone plays them
For the rest my answers and lisa 's arnt' actually different
Panic, Chaos, Fear… My work here is done.
Alright, here I go.
Selling:
Cloak of Resistance +4 : 8,000 gold
Psychoactive Skin of Ectoplasmic Armor, 3,000 GP:
Healing Belt: 375 Gold
Torq of Power Preservation: 2,000
Total Sale: 13,375
Gold on hand: 133,958
Hold on to your hats, this is gonna take awhile.
Purchasing:
Gray Robes of the Archmagi: 75,000 Gold
Upgrading: Ring of Protection from +1 to +4: 31,000
Belt of Battle: 12,000 gold
Final Cost: 118,000
Gold Left: 15,958
This is from my own past experiences so I cant say yes or no to all of them…I'll answer what I know.
Q:Should spells with free material components be listed as having material components in the spell description?
A: I'll leave that to your better judgement, not too many pay attention to these unless the cost is very significant.
Q:Should spells with expensive material components under 125 gp (which are free to cast due to free eschew materials) have those expensive material components removed?
A: I don't believe so for completeness sake, but others may disagree with me.
Q: If no, should they be marked as having an expensive material component in the spell list (such as the page "Cleric Spells")?
A: I believe so, again for completeness sake.
Q: If yes, is it understood that doing so will make these spells cheaper to create in magical items?
A: Yup.
Q: Are all spells from the Player's Handbook, as they appear in the SRD, legal?
A: Yes
Q: Do any of these spells in the Player's Handbook have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: Not to my knowledge, check with other staff to be certain.
Q: Are all spells from Spell Compendium legal?
A: All spells from the Spell Compendium are legal.
Q: Do any of these legal spells from the Spell Compendium have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: As before, not to my knowledge, but you may wish to ask around.
Q:Are all spells from the Player's Handbook 2 legal?
A: Yes, as these have been requested before.
Q: Do any of these legal spells from the Player's Handbook 2 have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: As before, not to my knowledge, but you may wish to ask around.
Q: Are all psionic powers and magic spells from the Expanded Psionics Handbook legal?
A: Yes.
Do any of these legal spells from Expanded Psionics Handbook have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: No
Q: Are all psionic powers and magic spells from Complete Psionic legal?
A: Yes
Q: Do any of these legal spells/powers from Complete Psionic have changes (not counting most recent errata) beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: None known.
Q: If not all psionic powers from Complete Psion legal, what is the state of ardent mantles, and complete psionic classes spell lists?
A: As far as its known, all mantles are accessable.
Q: Are any domains changed from their original source, in name, spell list, or granted power?
A: No
Q: Should any domains not currently used by a deity be removed?
A: This is a tricky question, you see there has been on the books for awhile now about a deity rework, but no one's been forth coming for awhile.
Q: Are all Artificer Infusions found in the Eberron Campaign Setting legal, and do they have any changes made to them beyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: Yes, as written
Q: Are any other Artificer Infusions from other books (ex; Magic of Eberron) legal, and do they have any changes made to the mbeyond the removal of material components costing under 125 gp?
A: Unknown at this time, see Ibis or Jenn
Q: Are all Binder vestiges and Shadowcaster mysteries, as they originally appeared in Tome of Magic, legal? Do any have changes made to them beyond the most recent errata?
A: Not my field of expertise, consult Ibis or Jenn.
Q: Are any Binder vestiges or Shadowcaster mysteries from any other source legal?
A: These are usually on a case by case basis, the default is no, but speak with Ibis or Jenn on the matter.
Q: Are all Warlock invocations from Complete Arcane legal? Do any have changes made to them beyond the most recent errata?
A: Yes and they should appear as they are in the complete arcane with errata.
Q: Are Warlock invocations from Complete Mage legal? Do any have changes made to them beyond the most recent errata?
A: Yes and they should appear as they are in the complete arcane with errata.
Q: Are Warlock invocations from any other source legal?
A: No, Invocations from Dragon Magic were denied some time ago.
Q: Are all Tome of Battle powers legal, and do any have any changes made to them beyond the most recent errata?
A: Yes, they are legal, the ban on these were lifted some time ago safe for a select few (IE: Adaptive Style). Edit: All Maneuvers and Stances are Legal.
Q: Are all Skill Tricks from Complete Adventurer legal? Do any have changes made to them?
A: All of them are legal, as printed.
That is not a contradiction. The caster level is determined by the item itself, but the ones listed in item descriptions are explicitly averages, as set out by the FAQ. This is why, for example, Ioun Stones are listed as BOTH "CL 12" and "Requires caster level 12". Were the rules are you were interpreting them, such a distinction would be completely unnecessary.
page revision: 0, last edited: 17 Jul 2010 06:00
